I put my money on the Conquistador for their proven and documented A$$ KickingHows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
Conquistador, allied with smallpox, wins hands down.Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
If the Aztecs were smart enough to charge as a group they would win with only two or three casualties. If they tried to fight at a distance (like they did against Cortez) they would lose. Also, if the conquistador was on horseback he would win.Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
That show is a complete joke!!! My whole life(40 plus0 I've been a boxer, a wrestler, a TKD BB and now a practioner of karate,, and one thing holds the truest,,IT'S NOT THE SIZE OF THE DOG IN THE FIGHT,, IT'S THE SIZE OF THE FIGHT IN THE DOG! That show just generalizes what they feel is superior.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
I put my money on the Conquistador for their proven and documented A$$ KickinHows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
Aztecs all the way Conquistadors suck!!!!Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
The Conquistador will be too busy praying to God so that he doesn't end up killed.Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
The Conquistador will be too busy stealing and pillaging to care about twenty Aztecs. Besides, the conquistador will just shoot the Aztecs while the Aztecs are trying to be friendly. The Spanish conquistadors are proven and documented murdering, terroristic, genocidal, plundering maniacal religious zealots who destroyed anything and anyone who got in the way of their stealing every iota of treasure they could possible take from the New World.
Aztecs all the way Conquistadors suck!!!!Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
The Conquistador will be too busy praying to God so that he doesn't end up killed.Hows this deadliest warrior episode sound: Conquistador vs. 20 aztecs?
The Conquistador will be too busy stealing and pillaging to care about twenty Aztecs. Besides, the conquistador will just shoot the Aztecs while the Aztecs are trying to be friendly. The Spanish conquistadors are proven and documented murdering, terroristic, genocidal, plundering maniacal religious zealots who destroyed anything and anyone who got in the way of their stealing every iota of treasure they could possible take from the New World.
Are the results on deadliest warrior accurate?
to me it seems there is no way their results are anywhere close to accurate. the warriors who they are studying would use their weapons much more effectively than the people they bring in to test the weapons. there are so many variables like strength and training. every episode is the same, they disagree which is the better warrior, then after every weapon they say holy crap that is a kill shot. tAre the results on deadliest warrior accurate?
No, the show is pretty much complete bullshat. But it is really fun to watch.
I continuesly say that the show should be called deadliest weapon because they do not test the martial art behind the weapon. Example, even though the shaolin monks have the highest kill rate yet, I still think they got shafted because they did not factor the lifetime of hard and powerful MA training.
The same can be said for almost all those battles, excluding the gun fights. Those were just stupid in all respects, ha ha.
I saw a ninja fight a spartan once...it was epic
they just let comanches beat mongols so the answer is no it is not accurate at all
Eh. It's more scientific than the poorly named "Fight Science". It still has problems, though. For starters, it's hard to quantify the training of the actual warriors until you get to the 20th Century stuff. Even the "Shaolin monks" performed in historically inaccurate manners, owing more to modern Wushu than actual traditional Chinese fighting methods. Now some things they can legitimately test, like the cutting power of a katana vs. chain mail (I don't care if you're a samurai fanboy or not, a razor can't cut through chain links). But some of the other tests weren't done in a way that you could actually quantify things, for example the meat-cutting tests, and hardly any were done in a comparitive way. One of my buddies likes to point out that one guy gets to bash a plastic skull, while another faces a block of ballistics gel. That's not very scientific when you're comparing the weapons. But until someone develops a time machine, that's the best thing we have to work with. By and large, it's just for fun, and I gotta laugh at people who take it too seriously.
Depends on what type of accuracy your looking for. As far as measuring the speed, force, and damage of the fighter being tested, they have reached an unparalled level of scientific data collection. They do run 1000 separate simulations where they change the stats on a "generic" fighter and the computer runs the numbers against each other. This seems good in theory, but the problem is, the computer completely forgets terrain the fighters are engaged at (as a slippery ships floor COULD favor a viking against a samurai). Also the fighters endurance isn't figured in, as well as the most important thing that their is NO substitute for, EXPERIENCE. Obviously regardless of what style of fighter you are, a more experienced fighter almost always has the upperhand. The more battles you've fought, the more knowledge you have on how to counter someone who may be stronger, faster, or more talented than yourself. Obviously raw data is all we can measure in this day and age without literally killing someone, but you have to admit, its great fun to speculate, support your favorite style, and see what carnage the weapons can potentially do.
It is as accurate as it can be. There is only so much a Computer can calculate. Things like a persons true skill and tactics can not be calculated accurately.
I do not dislike the show or the results, but realistically it is just entertainment. In the end no it is not completely accurate but it can still be fun to watch when I have the time
no not at all, they would test the weapons and some of them would be direct kill shots, but then once they used them in the reenactment they wouldn't do anything. and you can't put something like that on a computer to get the most accurate you would have to take two actual warriors and which is impossible and would never happen. haha.
by no means is it accurate they do not have a control and without a control what scientific data could you hope to find? ( historical and scientific inaccuracies aside) it is an interesting show it is entertaining however it does start more "who can beat who" arguments than it could ever hope to solve
if it was real you'd get bored and watch Spongebob so they gott liven it up and skew the results. there's no way to test who would win. too many "chances" left out. it's really onlt testing the weapons of combative societies. which they still screw up
The show is kind of amusing, but the "results", and the way they come to those "results" is complete garbage.
No, the show is pretty much complete bullshat. But it is really fun to watch.
I continuesly say that the show should be called deadliest weapon because they do not test the martial art behind the weapon. Example, even though the shaolin monks have the highest kill rate yet, I still think they got shafted because they did not factor the lifetime of hard and powerful MA training.
The same can be said for almost all those battles, excluding the gun fights. Those were just stupid in all respects, ha ha.
I saw a ninja fight a spartan once...it was epic
Report Abuse
Are the results on deadliest warrior accurate?they just let comanches beat mongols so the answer is no it is not accurate at all
Report Abuse
Are the results on deadliest warrior accurate?Eh. It's more scientific than the poorly named "Fight Science". It still has problems, though. For starters, it's hard to quantify the training of the actual warriors until you get to the 20th Century stuff. Even the "Shaolin monks" performed in historically inaccurate manners, owing more to modern Wushu than actual traditional Chinese fighting methods. Now some things they can legitimately test, like the cutting power of a katana vs. chain mail (I don't care if you're a samurai fanboy or not, a razor can't cut through chain links). But some of the other tests weren't done in a way that you could actually quantify things, for example the meat-cutting tests, and hardly any were done in a comparitive way. One of my buddies likes to point out that one guy gets to bash a plastic skull, while another faces a block of ballistics gel. That's not very scientific when you're comparing the weapons. But until someone develops a time machine, that's the best thing we have to work with. By and large, it's just for fun, and I gotta laugh at people who take it too seriously.
Depends on what type of accuracy your looking for. As far as measuring the speed, force, and damage of the fighter being tested, they have reached an unparalled level of scientific data collection. They do run 1000 separate simulations where they change the stats on a "generic" fighter and the computer runs the numbers against each other. This seems good in theory, but the problem is, the computer completely forgets terrain the fighters are engaged at (as a slippery ships floor COULD favor a viking against a samurai). Also the fighters endurance isn't figured in, as well as the most important thing that their is NO substitute for, EXPERIENCE. Obviously regardless of what style of fighter you are, a more experienced fighter almost always has the upperhand. The more battles you've fought, the more knowledge you have on how to counter someone who may be stronger, faster, or more talented than yourself. Obviously raw data is all we can measure in this day and age without literally killing someone, but you have to admit, its great fun to speculate, support your favorite style, and see what carnage the weapons can potentially do.
It is as accurate as it can be. There is only so much a Computer can calculate. Things like a persons true skill and tactics can not be calculated accurately.
I do not dislike the show or the results, but realistically it is just entertainment. In the end no it is not completely accurate but it can still be fun to watch when I have the time
no not at all, they would test the weapons and some of them would be direct kill shots, but then once they used them in the reenactment they wouldn't do anything. and you can't put something like that on a computer to get the most accurate you would have to take two actual warriors and which is impossible and would never happen. haha.
by no means is it accurate they do not have a control and without a control what scientific data could you hope to find? ( historical and scientific inaccuracies aside) it is an interesting show it is entertaining however it does start more "who can beat who" arguments than it could ever hope to solve
if it was real you'd get bored and watch Spongebob so they gott liven it up and skew the results. there's no way to test who would win. too many "chances" left out. it's really onlt testing the weapons of combative societies. which they still screw up
The show is kind of amusing, but the "results", and the way they come to those "results" is complete garbage.
Deadliest Warrior: Legends game, secret weapons?
Alright, so I just bought Deadliest Warrior: Legends on XBLA, and I was going through the warrior titles, and some of them said to beat arcade on deadliest using only "Tribal flute" and these other weird weapons. Just wondering, are there secret weapons in the game, and, if so, how do you unlock them??Deadliest Warrior: Legends game, secret weapons?
Beat arcade mode with all characters to unlock challenge mode. Than kill 25 people in survival slice with any of the characters.
Beat arcade mode with all characters to unlock challenge mode. Than kill 25 people in survival slice with any of the characters.
Who won the Deadliest Warrior match up of S.W.A.T. vs. GSG9?
I was watching the first episode of Deadliest Warrior Season 2 (American S.W.A.T. vs. German GSG9) and I fell asleep half way through. I'm curious as to who won the match up.Who won the Deadliest Warrior match up of S.W.A.T. vs. GSG9?
They made SWAT win because Americans are watching this. You can see them do the testing, and they even say GSG9's sniper rifle does better than SWAT's sniper rifle, and in the aftermath, you can see that for some reason, SWAT got 66 more kills than GSG9 from their snipers.
The PSG is obviously better than the Remington 700, I think they rigged it.
The SWAT guys owned the GSG-9 in the shooting competitions even with the admittedly inferior weapons (the SEALS won by outshooting the Israelis in real life too). They just have more skill but this is LA SWAT, not just any random middle of nowhere SWAT team like the title would make you believe.
So, to explain it, SWAT got 66 more kills because part of the algorithm also takes into account the ability to use the weapon and not just which weapon is better. LA SWAT did a better job shooting in the real-life test. If GSG-9 had done a better job, they would have undoubtedly won snipers.
They had completely different tactics in the simulation, which would be different in RL. If you watch it, SWAT only camps, while GSG9 does all the rushing, which from any COD game you can tell how much of an advantage camping is.
S.W.A.T.
SWAT won. The deadliest weapon for both teams was actually the sniper rifle
S.W.A.T that fight was really cool
swat won should watch got a real sick endingskin
They made SWAT win because Americans are watching this. You can see them do the testing, and they even say GSG9's sniper rifle does better than SWAT's sniper rifle, and in the aftermath, you can see that for some reason, SWAT got 66 more kills than GSG9 from their snipers.
The PSG is obviously better than the Remington 700, I think they rigged it.
The SWAT guys owned the GSG-9 in the shooting competitions even with the admittedly inferior weapons (the SEALS won by outshooting the Israelis in real life too). They just have more skill but this is LA SWAT, not just any random middle of nowhere SWAT team like the title would make you believe.
Report Abuse
Who won the Deadliest Warrior match up of S.W.A.T. vs. GSG9?So, to explain it, SWAT got 66 more kills because part of the algorithm also takes into account the ability to use the weapon and not just which weapon is better. LA SWAT did a better job shooting in the real-life test. If GSG-9 had done a better job, they would have undoubtedly won snipers.
Report Abuse
Who won the Deadliest Warrior match up of S.W.A.T. vs. GSG9?They had completely different tactics in the simulation, which would be different in RL. If you watch it, SWAT only camps, while GSG9 does all the rushing, which from any COD game you can tell how much of an advantage camping is.
Report Abuse
S.W.A.T.
SWAT won. The deadliest weapon for both teams was actually the sniper rifle
S.W.A.T that fight was really cool
swat won should watch got a real sick ending
Deadliest warrior game?
I have xbox 360 but its not hooked up to the live network, can you buy the deadliest warrior game on a disc? and if so where?Deadliest warrior game?
no the deadliest warrior the game is a downloadable game and it is only for the 360. The game is downloadable not a disc based game i hoped this helped:)
no the deadliest warrior the game is a downloadable game and it is only for the 360. The game is downloadable not a disc based game i hoped this helped:)
Is the new deadliest warrior on today?
On spike.com it says its tonight at 10p/9c. right now its showing the swat one. did the new one finish or is it starting next hour?Is the new deadliest warrior on today?
It's on June 8.
It's on June 8.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)