Is it true that the show Deadliest warrior isnt accurate of a real battle?

i mean realy how can unarmored pirate beat an aromerd knight i dont see how thats possible.Is it true that the show Deadliest warrior isnt accurate of a real battle?
that shows leaves too many details off , like i saw one that compare Green Beret vs Spetnaz but they didnt put in account who had superior body armor and technology and support elements and ammo load capabilities , they just went for all the offensive aspects like weapons and effectiveness and cool aspects..



i found pretty funny that they run out of ammo in the combat simulation lol.. i remember carrying at least 6 magazines of 28 rounds everywhere...
OH MY GOSH!!! I totally agree! I watch it and I wondered about that too! That was so stupid!

Yeah I really don't think they have the exact outcome of a battle.

Like, the way people fight difffer. It's hard to explain the way I see it.

Like..... They probably have a different style ya know?

And in the fight with the pirate and knight, the knight had a metal mask and the pirate threw sand in his face, temporarily blinding him. That was so stupid. It made me angry!

So yeah, I totally agree with you!!!Is it true that the show Deadliest warrior isnt accurate of a real battle?
It definitely is not accurate. There are a lot of factors that the do not consider, such as training, style, knowledge, etc. From what I have seen, the main thing that they take into account is just the weapons.Is it true that the show Deadliest warrior isnt accurate of a real battle?
That show is depicting a battle based on the percentage of wins.

The most probable reason the pirate won was the guns.

More modern technology.
No,real battles kill people. But it is a pretty good attempt to analyze what would happen if these warriors did meet.
Because an Armored knight is wearing 300 pounds of stuff. I wound how well he moves?
Because the pirate has a gun.
Never bring a sword to a gun fight.