What is your opinion on the show "Deadliest Warrior"?

I enjoy watching the show, and they do some nice comparisons, but in my opinion, they don't do enough to account tactics or training to really show a good comparison. I wouldn't how they would show that. What do you think of the show?What is your opinion on the show "Deadliest Warrior"?
I like the show, learned some interesting things. It's more of a weapons based format, environmental factors, physical conditioning, training ect. are just to much information to put into a 30 min. format.
i find it extremely entertaining to watch but dont consider it 100% accurate. Assuming everything they do is completely correct and truthful as it is presented you still run into the problem of a current practitioner of a particular fighting style will never be as good as the original people who lived and breathed those techniques.What is your opinion on the show "Deadliest Warrior"?
i enjoy it i think its pretty cool. its one flaw is based on a computer program which is not all that reliable in my opinion.What is your opinion on the show "Deadliest Warrior"?
From a technical perspective, I think they do a pretty good job of comparing the effectiveness of the equipment the warriors use. But after watching a few more episodes, I realized that they often underestimate most of the warriors' training and techniques that they utilize in a real battle in order to be effective.



Perhaps the only way to gauge the effectiveness of these warriors is through a real duel when life and death are at stake, which obviously can't be portrayed through experiments and a TV show.
i like it. dont think its accurate enough. i would rather they let the viewer choose who wins in their own mind. just provide the information and the possible outcomes. i hate there being a loser. especially when i disagree