Deadliest warrior show on spike tv?

I was watching deadliest warrior on the computer the other day and i saw the one when a ninja fights a spartan and the spartan won. Do you think that is true? I really doubt that and I think that the ninja would have won.Deadliest warrior show on spike tv?
Show is always a show and it brings so many tactics to confuse us, on real situation, any of them can win but such is just an entertainment, so don't take it seriously.



Good luck





________
At the 0:29th second of the fight you see the Ninja sneak up on the Spartan and im sure that the ninja would have killed him because his back was turned. I highly doubt that he would of gone to stab him with his sword, he would of most likely broke his neck or done something quick and got it over with but the show focuses on weapons and armour not on technique so for me I would have to say the Ninja would have defeated the Spartan.Deadliest warrior show on spike tv?
The show is deadliest warrior.



Total death match. The spartans are hardened military warriors with tough armors. Ninjas were just lower class thieves and hit-and-run fighters.



The show displays a head on confrontation, of course the Spartan wins.



Either way, the show isn't all that accurate, it's just a more educated answer to "who would win in a fight, this guy or this guy?" It's just entertainment.Deadliest warrior show on spike tv?
I dislike a lot of things about that show, but all things being equal, we're talking a human being with armor vs. one without, armed with bladed weapons with a similar range. The odds are in favor of the guy with the defensive edge (Spartan). The ninja get a bunch of hype, but most of that is pop culture and not historic fact. At the end of the day, they were just dudes, like everyone else. No magic powers, no "best martial arts skills ever", just guys. They were clandestine rebels and spies, yes, but the movies get a lot of it wrong. For example, they weren't too big on wearing all black:



http://www.yamasa.org/japan/english/dest鈥?/a>



Ninja weren't "stand and fight" kind of guys, they were "run and hide" kind of guys. That's reflected in the weapons demonstrated for the show, which were relatively non-lethal. The "black egg" was essentially a slightly upgraded version of throwing sand in someone's eyes, the shuriken and blowgun rarely gets penetration to cause a lethal wound (again, despite what the movies would have you believe) and as utilitarian as the karusigama is, it's a little awkward to use. Meanwhile, the Spartan's tools were pretty much designed to kill you as quickly as possible; on the battlefield, where the Spartans fought, you can't give someone a "distracting" wound and hope they'll go away. The javelin, spear, and sword were all designed to take out another warrier immediately, while the shield, being a combination offensive/defensive weapon, was one of the most utilitarian weapons ever seen on the show. Given those factors, and the fact that what most people "know" about the ninja was made up in the last 150 years or so, then yeah, I'm going to give the Spartan a significant edge in the fight.
i really hate these kinds of questions because again, the better, smarter fighter is gonna win that bout. Personally I think a ninja would win, because in ninjutsu, you learn about striking nerve clusters. it takes more than brute strength to win a fight.
That show doesn't take tactics and strategies into consideration when running their computer simulations. About the only real prediction you can infer from the deadliest warrior is some one is going to ask questions like this one.
A spartan is an armored tank, built to kill. Despite the agility of the ninja, they aren't as deadly as Spartans. End of story.
Yea I get ya I think a ninja would kill a Spartan if they were in urban or close quarters combat but in overall strength and skill I think the Spartan would own
It all depends on the environment, how they fight etc. They can both win in certain ways
That show is the biggest BS on TV.