Does anyone think the show deadliest warrior is racist?

I see it as just a show ,, but a few of my friends complain that "shaka zulu wouldn't have lost to a fat scottish guy" and "there is no way a 6'3 viking would lose to a 5'6 samurai"

also do you think that they do take cultural size averages into the equation ?

thanks for you answers , I love youDoes anyone think the show deadliest warrior is racist?
Deadliest Warrior fails; they're very biased towards Americans and they never fully test the weapons, even in the most obvious aspects. For example, the M16 used by the IRA edged out the AK-47 because it was more accurate, period---what about stopping power and penetrating power combined? I've heard stories of US soldiers shooting charging insurgents with the 5.56 cartridge and not doing much more than making them more mad and charge faster. Also, try emptying an M16, or M4, 30 round magazine without it jamming at least once--if your gun doesn't fire, accuracy doesn't count for beans. In the SWAT vs GSG-9 episode, the Remington 700 got more kills than the PSG-1, how does that make ANY sense; the PSG-1 is capable of semi-automatic fire, the remington, bolt action; the PSG can utilize a 20-round external magazine for high capacity and quick reloading, the remington can utilize a detachable mag as well but it can only hold 6 rounds at MAX; and it's not like the semi-automatic fire will make the PSG-1 less accurate than the remington unlike other semi-autos because it DOESN'T have a heavy moving bolt, like say the M82, and it also utilizes a delayed-blowback operation. As for the explosives, the Spetznaz had the RGD and the Green Berets had the M69 grenades, but as for any accurate results, wouldn't anyone test them under the same circumstances? Anyone but deadliest warrior would; they tested the M69 in a clothes washer, to devastating effect, and they tested the RGD in a hastily built "room" with GLASS walls, to no effect. Which leads to the testing of the less lethal weapons in the SWAT vs GSG-9 episode, the Taser shockwave and the stingball grenade--two ENTIRELY different weapons for ENTIRELY different purposes which were stupidly pitted against each other; the shockwave was strictly for crowd control, and the stingball was strictly for room breaching and entering. I would love to see any fool try to breach and enter a room with the shockwave and succeed, as well as any fool try to control a crowd with the stingball grenade and not sack himself--senseless weapon match-ups. It is clear how Deadliest Warrior can only appeal to pubescent adolescents infatuated with gore and guns.
Yeah i totally think you took that from somewhere else..i was reading something just like that just now

Report Abuse

Does anyone think the show deadliest warrior is racist?
There are no real "Samurai Warriors" left or any of those people of the old days. It's a TV show that attracts people who want to be so called hard asses. It's just entertainment. Who cares if they are racist or not. As long as they are getting paid, I'm sure they won't make a big deal about it.Does anyone think the show deadliest warrior is racist?
It's not racist.

It's a little like Marvel vs Capcom though.



A bunch of variables are run through a "computer simulation" several times and averaged.



In any given "simulation" either side might be declared "winner" so the argument that one side or another "IS" valid in a given "single simulation".
The battles are based on how warriors fought (style), and what weapons were used. Height is irrelevant when both fighters have armor and bladed weapons.



Winners are chosen by most victories in computer simulated battles.
sounds rascist