Ninjas didn't fight anyway. They assassinated. That was their specialty. I disagree with knight vs. pirate. Every one of the knights weapons was one shot kill basically. The blunderbuss (shotgun) was the only maybe lethal pirate weapon. A few projectiles penetrated ONE layer of armor. The grenade is only useful in rooms or on groups of people because the fuse wouldn't be exact enough to throw it and have it blow up next to his head(like in the simulation). A few years more advanced firearms and then I would agree with the outcome. But not with the firearms shown. Of course their battlefields are also very different. A knight would be clumsy on a ship and sink like a stone if he fell over.
It's only a TV show, and they did give the Monk the win over the Maori, the Spartans didn't have a 4 foot shield, So if the battles didn't go your way, you think it's unfair?
So you think the Spartans who trained their entire life for battle couldn't beat Ninjas? Why? You don't think strength has any part in a fight? Do you really think throwing stars, and hopping out of trees is an effective way to battle?Poll: Do you people find Deadliest Warrior (the simulation) cheap/unfair?
It is a computer program that picks the winner. Kinda odd. I think the ninja would take out Spartans at long range, or in the middle of the night. Hand to hand, the Spartans have more armor and shields.Poll: Do you people find Deadliest Warrior (the simulation) cheap/unfair?
There is no way to assess whether it is fair or not, because the design of the software they use is a secret.
They normally give the edge to the ones with strength. They don't look at the smarts/wits. And they underestimate martial arts, I do agree Ninja and Yakuza should've defenitely won.
has anyone noticed that the program they input data on is Microsoft excel? ive looked for slytherin studios but nothing. that show is interesting, but dont loose sleep over what could or should have happened.
Sometimes
No comments:
Post a Comment